Severance Agreement in California

ContractsCounsel has assisted 299 clients with severance agreements and maintains a network of 150 employment lawyers available daily. These lawyers collectively have 63 reviews to help you choose the best lawyer for your needs. Customers rate lawyers for severance agreement matters 4.97.

A severance agreement in California outlines terms for employee departure and issues like compensation, confidentiality & the right to consult an attorney. A California severance agreement grants employees a mandatory 5-business-day consideration period regardless of age and ensures they are informed of their right to consult an attorney. California's robust laws protect against unauthorized use and disclosure of confidential information, necessitating careful drafting to avoid silencing employees on workplace issues. Also, non-compete provisions are generally unenforceable and face heightened scrutiny, making it challenging to tailor agreements to protect both employer and employee interests. Let's learn about several aspects of the California severance agreement.

Considerations for Drafting a Severance Agreement in California

Here are some fundamental legal considerations for drafting a severance agreement.

• Claim Waivers and Consideration Periods: Severance agreements must navigate the complexities of claim waivers, especially those requiring consideration and specific revocation periods. The federal Older Workers Benefit Protection Act imposes specific requirements for employees over 40, including written disclosures and a 45-day consideration period (with an additional 7 days for revocation) in group terminations.
• State-specific Considerations: Certain states, such as California, introduce their own considerations and revocation periods. In California, regardless of age, employees are entitled to a 5-business day consideration period effective January 1, 2022. Employers must inform them of the right to consult an attorney for most severance agreements.
• Successors and Liability Issues: Ensuring that the release explicitly includes successors to the seller is essential to cover downstream liability. However, caution should be exercised in avoiding language that inadvertently acknowledges the buyer as a successor-in-interest.
• Property Obligations and Confidentiality: Severance agreements should remind employees of obligations related to the seller's tangible and intellectual property. Identifying confidential and proprietary information and outlining protective measures against unauthorized use are imperative. California law, for instance, may impact the extent of confidentiality provisions.

Employers’ Issues Regarding a Severance Agreement in California

Even though severance pay is not required under California law, employers facing disputes with existing employees should consider offering severance pay in exchange for releasing claims to preempt potential litigation. Here are five issues employers need to understand about severance agreement terms:

• Release of Claims : In severance agreements, employers should prioritize obtaining a clear and comprehensive release of known and unknown claims to minimize the risk of post-employment litigation. Courts emphasize the importance of a written release, barring fraud, deception, misrepresentation, duress, or undue influence (Skrbina v. Fleming Cos., 1996). In California, parties must expressly address unknown claims in the agreement, referencing California Civil Code section 1542, which stipulates that a general release does not extend to unknown claims the releasing party was unaware of when executing the release.
• Choice of Law and Venue: Employers must carefully consider the choice of law and venue in severance agreements, especially when dealing with employees primarily residing and working in California. California Labor Code section 925 prohibits employers from compelling such employees to adjudicate claims outside of California, ensuring substantive protection under California law. Although the statute doesn't apply to contracts negotiated with legal counsel representation or those entered into before January 1, 2017, careful consideration is needed, particularly as the severance agreement is executed after the employment relationship.
• No Rehire Provisions: Employers face restrictions on including no rehire provisions in severance agreements under specific circumstances. Code of Civil Procedure section 1002.5 invalidates provisions preventing workers from future employment with the settling employer or its affiliates, applying to employees who have filed claims through various channels, including internal complaints. Exceptions exist for cases involving a good faith determination by the employer that the individual engaged in sexual harassment or assault.
• Confidentiality: Severance agreements may incorporate limited confidentiality provisions, restricting the employee from disclosing the agreement's amount or terms. California employers, however, must exercise caution, as state law prohibits confidential settlement agreements or the nondisclosure of allegations related to workplace sexual harassment.
• Special Provisions for Release of Age Claims: For employees aged 40 or older, severance agreements releasing age discrimination claims must adhere to the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA). Compliance includes advising the employee to consult with an attorney, ensuring the waiver's clarity, providing a 21-day consideration period (which can be waived by the employee), and allowing a non-waivable seven-day revocation period post-execution. Employers, especially when offering releases to groups or classes of employees, should seek legal counsel to ensure compliance with the OWBPA. The EEOC website offers additional guidance and examples.

Tabetha H.

Pura R.

Darryl S.

Gill D.

Benefits of Hiring a Lawyer for a Severance Agreement in California

The following are the benefits of engaging a lawyer for a severance agreement in California:

• Negotiating Optimal Terms: Engaging a lawyer ensures skillful negotiation and securing favorable terms in the severance agreement, such as enhanced financial benefits or specific clauses to protect the employee's interests.
• Mitigating Legal Risks: Lawyers excel in identifying and mitigating potential legal risks associated with severance agreements. Their expertise helps avoid common pitfalls and ensures compliance with California's stringent employment laws.
• Crafting Robust Agreements: A lawyer adept at drafting severance agreements ensures precision and clarity in language, minimizing ambiguity and potential disputes. This meticulous drafting protects both parties and upholds the agreement's integrity.
• Navigating Complex Laws: California's intricate employment laws require nuanced understanding. A lawyer's familiarity with state-specific regulations enables them to navigate complexities, ensuring the agreement aligns seamlessly with legal requirements.
• Safeguarding Employee Rights: Legal professionals prioritize protecting employee rights. In the context of severance agreements, lawyers advocate for fair treatment, ensuring that employees receive the entitlements they deserve under California law.
• Providing Strategic Counsel: Lawyers offer strategic counsel beyond legalities, guiding clients on the broader implications of severance agreements. It includes advice on career transitions, potential impacts on future employment, and overall strategic decision-making.

Key Terms for a Severance Agreement in California

• Consideration Period: The time frame during which an employee, regardless of age, in California has the right to review and consider a severance agreement before signing.
• Age Discrimination Disclosures: Specific written disclosures mandated by the federal Older Workers Benefit Protection Act for employees over 40 releasing claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act.
• Revocation Period: The period, often 7 days, within which an employee over 40 has the right to revoke a signed severance agreement, even if initially agreed upon within the 45-day consideration period.
• Confidentiality Provisions: Clauses in severance agreements outline obligations and restrictions on disclosing confidential and proprietary business information, considering California's limitations.
• Non-compete Restrictions: Provisions addressing restrictions on an employee's ability to compete with the employer post-termination, considering California's general unenforceability of non-compete agreements.

Final Thoughts on a Severance Agreement in California

Navigating severance agreements in California demands meticulous attention to state-specific nuances, such as the mandatory consideration period and the need to respect employees' rights to consult an attorney. Careful drafting is essential, particularly regarding confidentiality provisions, as state laws safeguard employees' freedom to speak out against workplace misconduct. Employers should refrain from incorporating unenforceable provisions like non-competes and non-solicitations, recognizing that California's robust legal framework provides alternative means to protect confidential business information. Lastly, the administrative burden may necessitate tailored state-specific agreements, underscoring the importance of collaboration with legal counsel to ensure compliance and mitigate potential risks.

If you want free pricing proposals from vetted lawyers that are 60% less than typical law firms, Click here to get started. By comparing multiple proposals for free, you can save the time and stress of finding a quality lawyer for your business needs.

ContractsCounsel is not a law firm, and this post should not be considered and does not contain legal advice. To ensure the information and advice in this post are correct, sufficient, and appropriate for your situation, please consult a licensed attorney. Also, using or accessing ContractsCounsel's site does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and ContractsCounsel.

Need help with a Severance Agreement?

Meet some of our Lawyers

Tabetha H.

Tabetha H.

I am a startup veteran with a demonstrated history of execution with companies from formation through growth stage and acquisition. A collaborative and data-driven manager, I love to build and lead successful teams, and enjoy working full-stack across all aspects of the business.

David B.

David B.

Seasoned transactional attorney with extensive experience in the life sciences / medical device / pharmaceutical industries. Skilled at providing actionable legal advice that balances risk and reward.

Justin K.

Justin K.

I have been practicing law exclusively in the areas of business and real estate transactions since joining the profession in 2003. I began my career in the Corporate/Finance department of Sidley's Los Angeles office. I am presently a solo practitioner/freelancer, and service both business- and attorney-clients in those roles.

Terence B.

Terence B.

Terry Brennan is an experienced corporate, intellectual property and emerging company transactions attorney who has been a partner at two national Wall Street law firms and a trusted corporate counsel. He focuses on providing practical, cost-efficient and creative legal advice to entrepreneurs, established enterprises and investors for business, corporate finance, intellectual property and technology transactions. As a partner at prominent law firms, Terry's work centered around financing, mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures, securities transactions, outsourcing and structuring of business entities to protect, license, finance and commercialize technology, manufacturing, digital media, intellectual property, entertainment and financial assets. As the General Counsel of IBAX Healthcare Systems, Terry was responsible for all legal and related business matters including health information systems licensing agreements, merger and acquisitions, product development and regulatory issues, contract administration, and litigation. Terry is a graduate of the Georgetown University Law Center, where he was an Editor of the law review. He is active in a number of economic development, entrepreneurial accelerators, veterans and civic organizations in Florida and New York.

Rosario A.

Rosario A.

I'm a Washington-licensed lawyer specializing in trademark practice and with an extensive trademark education and academic background. I currently work with domestic and international businesses seeking trademark protection in the U.S. by conducting trademark searches, providing legal advice, submitting USPTO applications, and preparing responses to office actions. I'm passionate about trademark law and always looking forward to helping small and medium businesses promote their value by having a registered federal trademark. If you have questions or concerns about trademark/copyright/IP licensing and require legal advice, feel free to contact me and we can have a first chat.

Anatalia S.

Anatalia S.

High quality work product at affordable prices.

Braden P.

Braden P.

Braden Perry is a corporate governance, regulatory and government investigations attorney with Kennyhertz Perry, LLC. Mr. Perry has the unique tripartite experience of a white-collar criminal defense and government compliance, investigations, and litigation attorney at a national law firm; a senior enforcement attorney at a federal regulatory agency; and the Chief Compliance Officer/Chief Regulatory Attorney of a global financial institution. Mr. Perry has extensive experience advising clients in federal inquiries and investigations, particularly in enforcement matters involving technological issues. He couples his technical knowledge and experience defending clients in front of federal agencies with a broad-based understanding of compliance from an institutional and regulatory perspective.

William F.

William F.

William L Foster has been practicing law since 2006 as an attorney associate for a large litigation firm in Denver, Colorado. His experience includes drafting business contracts, organizational filings, and settlement agreements.

Jeffrey P.

Jeffrey P.

Mr. Pomeranz serves as the principal of Pomeranz Law PLLC, a boutique law firm representing clients across myriad industries and verticals. Before founding the firm, Mr. Pomeranz served as Senior Vice President, Legal & Compliance and General Counsel of Mortgage Connect, LP in 2017. Mr. Pomeranz also served as Counsel, Transactions for Altisource Portfolio Solutions S.A. (NASDAQ: ASPS) beginning in 2013, and was based in the company’s C-Suite in Luxembourg City, Luxembourg. Mr. Pomeranz began his career with Mainline Information Systems, Inc. as an in-house attorney.

Rinky P.

Rinky P.

Rinky S. Parwani began her career practicing law in Beverly Hills, California handling high profile complex litigation and entertainment law matters. Later, her practice turned transactional to Lake Tahoe, California with a focus on business startups, trademarks, real estate resort development and government law. After leaving California, she also served as in-house counsel for a major lending corporation headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa as well as a Senior Vice President of Compliance for a fortune 500 mortgage operation in Dallas, Texas prior to opening Parwani Law, P.A. in Tampa, Florida. She has represented various sophisticated individual, government and corporate clients and counseled in a variety of litigation and corporate matters throughout her career. Ms. Parwani also has prior experience with state and federal consumer lending laws for unsecured credit cards, revolving credit, secured loans, retail credit, sales finance and mortgage loans. She also has served as a special magistrate and legal counsel for numerous Florida County Value Adjustment Boards. Her practice varies significantly from unique federal and state litigation cases to transactional matters. Born and raised in Des Moines, Iowa, Ms. Parwani worked in private accounting for several years prior to law school. Her background includes a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) certificate from Iowa (currently the license is inactive) and a Certified Management Accountant (CMA) designation (currently the designation is inactive). Ms. Parwani or the firm is currently a member of the following organizations: Hillsborough County Bar Association, American Bar Association, Tampa Bay Bankruptcy Bar Association, National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys, and the American Immigration Lawyers Association. She is a Fellow of the American Bar Association. Ms. Parwani is a frequent volunteer for Fox Channel 13 Tampa Bay Ask-A-Lawyer. She has published an article entitled "Advising Your Client in Foreclosure" in the Stetson Law Review, Volume 41, No. 3, Spring 2012 Foreclosure Symposium Edition. She is a frequent continuing legal education speaker and has also taught bankruptcy seminars for the American Bar Association and Amstar Litigation. She was commissioned by the Governor of Kentucky as a Kentucky Colonel. In addition, she teaches Immigration Law, Bankruptcy Law and Legal Research and Writing as an adjunct faculty instructor at the Hillsborough Community College Ybor campus in the paralegal studies program.